Microsoft EU Antitrust Case
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : BENV005
Case Length : 16 Pages
Period : 1998-2006
Pub Date : 2006
Teaching Note :Not Available Organization : Microsoft
Industry : Information Technology and Related Services Countries : US, European Countries
To download Microsoft EU Antitrust Case case study
(Case Code: BENV005) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 400 ; For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 400 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges
»
Business Environment Case Studies » Case Studies Collection » ICMR Home »
Business Environment Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
|
<< Previous
"We think that the facts will show that there is strong
competition and consumer choice. The impact of this case goes far beyond
Microsoft. The ability to innovate is important for the success of any company
and for the economic success of any country."1
- Brad Smith, Microsoft's General Counsel, in April 2006.
"The commission is not asking Microsoft to be nice to its
competitors. It is asking it to compete on the merits."2
- Per Hellstrom, European Commission's Lawyer, in April
2006.
Introduction
On April 24, 2006, the much-awaited trial between the US based software major
Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) and the European Commission (EC)3
began at the Court of First Instance (CFI)4,
Luxembourg (Refer Exhibit I for details on Microsoft).
Microsoft was appealing against the ruling given by EC on March 24, 2004, that
the company had abused its market leadership status by using its dominant
position in the Windows operating system (O/S) to gain market share in the work
group server O/S business. The EC ruling also stated that the company had added
Windows Media Player (WMP)5 software to
its Windows O/S and sold it free of cost.
|
|
As a punitive measure, the EC imposed a fine of 497 million euros6
on Microsoft.
|
The EC
began investigations into Microsoft's business practices following a
complaint from Sun Microsystems7
(Sun) in December 1998 which stated that Microsoft was trying to
illegally gain market share in the workgroup server O/S segment. The EC
also brought the WMP issue into the same case and after investigations
lasting more than five years, finally gave its ruling against Microsoft.
The company appealed against this decision at the CFI in June 2004. A
special panel of 13 judges heard the arguments of the two parties
between April 24 and 28, 2006 and was expected to give its ruling in the
first quarter of 2007 (Refer Exhibit II for chronology of events in the
case). |
Microsoft EU Antitrust Case
- Next Page>>
|
|