Mittal Steel: Consolidating US Operations


IBS CDC IBS CDC IBS CDC IBS CDC RSS Feed
 
Case Studies | Case Study in Business, Management, Operations, Strategy, Case Study

ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection

Case Details:

Case Code : BSTA008
Case Length : 12 Pages
Period : 1998 - 2005
Pub Date : 2005
Teaching Note :Not Available
Organization : Mittal Steel
Industry : Steel
Countries : USA

To download Mittal Steel: Consolidating US Operations case study (Case Code: BSTA008) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:





Price:

For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges


Business Strategy Case Studies
Case Studies Collection
Business Strategy Short Case Studies
View Detailed Pricing Info
How To Order This Case
Business Case Studies
Area Specific Case Studies
Industry Wise Case Studies
Company Wise Case Studies



Please note:

This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.

<< Previous

Introduction

L N Mittal (Mittal), chairman Ispat International, had grown from a wire rod manufacturer with a single plant in Indonesia in 1976 to being the owner of a steel company with a market capitalization of roughly $3 billion and net sales of $2.7 billion in 1996. This impressive growth, which had attracted media attention all over the world, had been driven by a series of acquisitions in Mexico, Canada, Trinidad, Germany, Ireland, and Kazakhstan between 1992 and 1996. Most of these acquisitions followed a similar pattern. As governments around the world privatised their steel industries, Ispat bought underperforming mills, maximized production, and upgraded the product mix. As soon as Mittal acquired a firm, he redirected sales and purchasing internationally in order to fetch the best prices.

Mittal had realised that the price of the steel scrap, the raw material for mini-mills, would rise as more mini-mills were constructed. He had therefore invested in a substitute for scrap known as direct-reduced iron (DRI), and was soon producing more of it than any one else. DRI cost about $95 a tonne in 1996, compared with $155 a tonne for the high-quality scrap that mini-mills mostly used, and $125 a tonne for the pig-iron used to make steel in blast furnaces. DRI was not a proprietary technology, but it was complicated and hard to copy.

Ispat had two decades of experience and analysts believed that Ispat's lead in DRI technology was "virtually insurmountable for the foreseeable future"1. By acquiring underperforming mills at bargain prices, Ispat was investing less for each tonne of steel-making capacity than any other firm in the world...

Excerpts >>


1] Scott, Morrison. An analyst with Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, an American investment bank, commented 10th January 1998, Vol. 346, Issue 8050, pp.55-56.

 

Case Studies Links:- Case Studies, Short Case Studies, Simplified Case Studies.

Other Case Studies:- Multimedia Case Study, Cases in Other Languages.

Business Reports Link:- Business Reports.

Books:- Textbooks, Work Books, Case Study Volumes.