Procter & Gamble in 2004: Managing Product Innovation
![RSS Feed IBS CDC RSS Feed](rss.png)
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : BSTA102
Case Length : 20 Pages
Period : 1837-2004
Organization : Procter & Gamble (P&G)
Pub Date : 2004
Teaching Note :Not Available Countries : Global, USA
Industry : Consumer Goods
To download Procter & Gamble in 2004: Managing Product Innovation case study (Case Code: BSTA102) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
![Case Studies | Case Study Online](Case%20Studies%20Online.jpg)
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500; For delivery through courier (within India): Rs.
500 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges
» Business Strategy Case Studies
» Business Strategy Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case
» Business Case Studies
» Area Specific Case Studies
» Industry Wise Case Studies
» Company Wise Case Studies
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
|
<< Previous
Introduction
When Alan Lafley became CEO in the summer of 2000, things had not been looking good for Procter & Gamble (P&G). Under his predecessor, Dirk Jager, costs had gone up, volumes stagnated and profit margins shrunk on P&G's biggest brands like Pampers, Tide, and Crest. But in 2004, many analysts believed the situation seemed to have improved significantly with Lafley having done a great job of turning the company around.
Lafley had focused on building the core brands even as he commenced a restructuring that involved $1.7 billion in cost cuts. He had also cut prices on many P&G products. As a result, over the past three years, core volume (units sold in P&G's existing businesses) rose on an average by 7% annually. The stock price had nearly doubled.
|
|
Lafley had attempted to introduce more creativity into P&G's innovation process, a major challenge for a company with a rule-bound culture. Since 2002, P&G had raised its new-product hit rate (the percentage of new entries that delivered a return above the cost of capital) from 70% to 90%.
In the first quarter of 2004, 19 of P&G's 20 largest brands improved their market shares. Overall core volume also rose by 12%, due to new product launches such as Olay Regenerist anti-aging creams, Prilosec heartburn pills, Swiffer dusters, and Mr. Clean AutoDry, a power gun spray that cleaned cars.
Though Lafley had made a few targeted acquisitions, P&G’s transformation was largely driven by organic growth...
Excerpts >>
![Case Studies | Case Study Online](Case%20Studies%20Online.jpg)
|
|