Executive Interviews: Interview with Bill Fischer on Building High Performance Teams
May 2009
-
By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary
Professor, it’s almost four years
since you (along with your co-author,
Andy Boynton) wrote that wonderful
piece in Harvard Business Review
(Virtuoso Teams, July-August 2005,
HBR). And of course, the subsequent
book, "Virtuoso Teams: Lessons from
Teams that Changed Their Worlds",
which rightly received well
appreciated recognition. Any
updates on this? One of the more gratifying
experiences relating to the Virtuoso
Teams project has been the increased
recognition of the power of virtuoso
teams as a means for getting more out
of an organization’s talent than would
typically have been the case. We are
now seeing them everywhere: the
Apple iPod team, for example, is a
great example of a VT; considerable
talent was assembled, they had an
ambitious goal, they worked in an
impolite manner, they thought better
of the customer, and, in return, they
revolutionized not just one but
several industries [music
distribution, the listening experience,
as well as news/opinion distribution
through iPods]; Motorola’s Razrproject
team, is another example, and
one whose product enjoyed the same
type of explosive growth as the iPod.
The two Swiss Alinghi teams, which
won sailing’s America’s Cup twice,
have also been classic VTs, and as a
resultwere able to overcome themore
natural advantages of the sea-going
Kiwis from New Zealand. Bruce
Springsteen and his E Street band has
operated as a VT duringmost of its 30
year-plus history. Perhaps most
interesting has been the new Obama
administration; which has
consciously adopted many of the
same VT attributes aswe’ve seen to be
so successful elsewhere. President
Obama, incidentally, was apparently
inspired by Doris Kearn Goodwin’s
history of Abraham Lincoln’s cabinet
(Team of Rivals), which was also a
classic virtuoso team. These new examples provide a broader-based
acknowledge-ment of the power of
the Virtuoso Team phenomenon.
-
You have spent six years studying
the inner workings of teams charged
with important projects in 20 of the
world’s best-known companies. Can
you elaborate on the background
research for this article/book? What
was the trigger point for this research? To be honest, it was probably more
than six years, and the “trigger-point”
for the project was our [Andy
Boynton and myself] experience with
many well-known companies who,
year after year, hire great people and
yet achieve, year after year, average
results. In effect, what we were seeing
were apparently organization and
leadership models that were
diminishing talent, rather than
enlarging it, and we found that result
to be professionally unacceptable. So,
we set off to find examples of teams
that really had assembled great talent
and were able to achieve
extraordinary results. The most
visible of those teams wound-up in
our book. -
For the benefit of our readers, can
you please elaborate on virtuoso
teams at Your Shows of Shows and
West Side Story? Your Show of Shows and West Side
Story were both project situations,
but with a big difference. West Side
Story was a radically new market
offering, in a mature industry, which
fundamentally changed both the
product offered, and the process by
which the project was conducted.
West Side Story was a blockbuster
Broadway hit that turned the postwar
concept of popular theatre on its
head. By combining complex music,
classical ballet, and social
consciousness into one offering, West
Side Story violated all of the
“product” norms that characterized
this industry at the time. It was
created by a true all-star team, which
believed that the customer was considerably more capable than the
traditional industry stereotype, and
then it delivered on this promise. Your Show of Shows, on the other
hand, was a weekly television
offering, led by a star-studded teamof
writers [Woody Allen, Mel Brooks,
Neil Simon, etc.], and could be
thought of as a project everyweek – or
“a Broadway show every week”, as
the team put it. At a time when the
typical television offering was
shallow comedy, Your Show of
Shows was a complex product
offering, and was produced in a
manner quite similar to that of West
Side Story: a great team of strong egos
involved in internal [impolite]
competition, yet working as a
cohesive team of comrades; a noncompromising,
and totally engaged
leader; an abiding commitment to
prototyping for learning; and a belief
that the customer was ready to be
stretched. -
What are virtuoso teams? What
constitutes a virtuoso teams? What
are their unique characters and
distinguishing strengths? The best way to answer this question
is to reflect on the preeminent
management lesson of our time: “Hire
for attitude; train for skills.” Read any
management book, and this will be
the primary message. We think that
while this might work fine for
managing day-to-day operations,
when “big change is necessary”, this
is bad advice. Instead, we believe that
when “big change” is the goal, the
leader is better advised to “Hire for
skills [because you need them!], and
figure out how to deal with the
attitudes that will inevitably come
with these highly-skilled
individuals.”
|