Executive Interviews: Interview with Daniel Lamarre on Blue Ocean Strategy
December 2008
-
By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary
-
Guy Laliberte (along with Daniel
Gauthier) founded Cirque Du Soleil
in 1984 and in 2000 Laliberte bought
out Gauthier and with 95%
ownership has expanded the brand.
How do you describe Guy
Laliberte's contributions, his
management philosophy and his
leadership style? Did his retirement
have any impact on the company? Guy Laliberte has not retired. He is
still with the company and is very
involved. He acts as a 'guide' for the
creation of all shows and still
approves all creative concepts for all
projects. Guy Laliberte is gifted with a
great sense of intuition when it comes
to shows and entertainment.
|
|
He
believes in taking risks and likes his
team to think "outside the box". He
believes in diversifying the type of
shows we do and that proved to be
the right thing to do to bring us where
we are almost 25 years later.
-
What were the vision/philosophy/
corporate values espoused by Guy
Laliberte? How do you ensure
employees stay connected with the
founder's vision, philosophy and
values? How do you ensure
continuity of that illustrious legacy?
Generally it is observed that, with
founders gone, the successors find it
difficult if not impossible to carry the
mantle having to rally the forces
around a vision? Do you think Guy
Laliberte is a visionary? Guy Laliberte is definitely a visionary.
As stated above, his strategies to find
the right balance between business
and creativity have been successful.
The corporate values of Cirque are
often what attract people to work for
the company. It is not difficult to have
the employees stay connected with
those values. Guy Laliberte has built a
great team of leaders around him to
ensure that the people who will come
after himshare the samemanagement
philosophy and pass it along. The
culture at Cirque du Soleil is strongly
integrated in all functions or sectors
of the company because of Guy. -
What does Blue Ocean Strategy
mean to you and Cirque Du Soleil?
Surely, you wouldn't have known
that you were creating a Blue Ocean
in 1984. As I expressed in your first question,
it is interesting to see 20 years after its
creation that very competent
University professors have analyzed
the work of a group of Street
performers... who applied rules of
the University of the Street! -
WChan Kim and Renee
Mauborgne in their celebrated
article (Blue Ocean Strategy, HBR,
October 2004) observed that,
"Instead of following the
conventional logic of outpacing the
competition by offering a better
solution to the given problem
creating a circus with even greater
fun and thrills it (Cirque Du Soleil)
redefined the problem itself by
offering people the fun and thrill of
the circus and the intellectual
sophistication and artistic richness
of the theater". What is this
intellectual sophistication and
artistic richness of the theater? How
could you blend them with a highly
commoditized entertainment element
like circus? Right at the beginning in 1984, and
even before then, Gilles Ste Croix had
his troup of stilt walkers and street
performers called Le Club des Talons
Hauts and they were doing theatre on
stilts in the street, combining music dance, theatre and acrobatics. That
really is at the roots of Cirque du
Soleil. The sophistication was
present even before the company was
named Cirque du Soleil. They then
brought under a tent what they were
actually doing in the streets. The
theatrical elements were always part
of Cirque du Soleil, only the means
got bigger but the intention to touch
the audience, to provoke emotions by
combining some artistic disciplines
was there and is still our motto today.
The difference is that in North
America, no one had done this or
seen this before. It was perceived as
something totally new and
sophisticated. -
How could you bump into such a
powerful business model? What
was the trigger point? What
prompted you to marry the best of
both the worlds circus and
theatre? Did you make any changes
to the business model in the last five
years? Maybe our geographical situation is
part of the answer: living in Quebec
and having been influenced by
Europeans who knew about that type
of circus arts called "new or
contemporary circus"in which we
took some of our inspiration, and
living in North America where
marketing is very strong helped us
create a kind of entertainment that
could be artistically very strong and
sophisticated and, at the same time,
profitable. What do you attribute Cirque Du
Soleils success to? In 20 years,
Cirque Du Soleil has achieved
revenues that Ringling Bros. and
Barnum & Bailey the worlds
leading circus took more than a
century to attain. If you have to list
out five critical success factors, what
would they be? What were the
lessons learnt along the 24 year
journey? There is no recipe for our success,
really. One thing has not changed throughout the 24 years of our short
history and that is the intention of
touching the audience, to make the
public remember a song, an act, a
character from our shows because it
meant something to them. Our shows
have a strong evocative power and
that could be why they are successful
worldwide. The storyline is not
obvious, we do not wish to impose it
on the public; we want the public to
make their own interpretation ofwhat
they see. We also strongly believe in
the power of art and creativity. We
make no artistic compromises. My
way of describing our model is by
saying that in the expression show
business, the word show comes
before business or if you prefer, if
you have a good show, you will have
a good financial model you will sell
tickets. How do you describe Cirque Du
Soleil's business a stable business
with fickle customers or stable
customers with fickle business? Like any business that depends on an
audience for its revenue flow, you
absolutely need to ALWAYS take into
account that audience. You need to
remain humble and not take it for
granted. You always need to be on top
of things and never sit on your past
successes. You have to keep your
audience interested and amazed.
1.
Blue Ocean Strategy Case Study
2. ICMR
Case Collection
3.
Case Study Volumes
|