Executive Interviews: Interview with Guillermo D'andrea on Emerging Markets
February 2008
-
By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary
Guillermo D'andrea Professor of Business Administration at IAE Business School, Austral University in Buenes Aires, Argentina. He is the Research Director of the Coca-Cola Retailing Research Center, Latin America.
How do you describe the slow but
confidant burst of growth in emerging
markets? Is this growth here to stay or
do you see this as an irrational
exuberance? In my opinion emerging markets are
the next market. Developed markets
are mature, with low or no growth
depending on the sector, strong
competition and eroding margins.
Some may consider them attractive
for their sophisticated demand, but
they are certainly challenging. Instead in emerging markets there's
strong demand, with several needs
still to be satisfied, and their potential
volume is immense. Let's keep in
mind we're talking about the 80% of
the world's population!
|
|
-
What are the origins of this new
found growth avenue? What are the
common factors that you think have
been majorly responsible for
emerging markets' growth story? In the past two decades, as markets
began to open with wealth slowly
spreading around the world and
emerging countries became more
politically stable, economic growth
brought in a significant number of
consumers to themarkets. We see the
surge of a growing middle class but
with a new picture. At least in Latin
America, where most of my research
takes place, the new middle class is
based on successful small
entrepreneurs rather than on public
employment, and this implies
different conditions. The new
middle class doesn't have the
requirement of a certain level of
education, but their success relies
more on individual initiative. That
brings a different sense of pride and
self-assessment. The consequence of
this is that they don't feel urged to
move up on the social ladder: they
made it in their own environment. If
they move to the higher side of town they'll be de-classed, losing their
identity, hardly gaining any
acceptance in this new environment.
So they'll rather stay where they feel
they belong, but with an improved
level of life. The implication of this is
they'll keep their ways, rather than
aspire to behave in foreign ones. This
implies in terms of brands and
products consumed. -
Many MNCs are already present
in one or more emerging markets.
However, not every company from
the same emerging economy reports a
success story. Why is it that some
companies are able to be successful
while many others aren't? It's a delicate balance between
pioneering products and
technologies and adapting to the local
needs. Often times we have seen
MNCs trying to impose products
simply because they are successful in
their original markets. Ice tea may be
quite acceptable in some markets, but
doesn't necessarily fit to the taste of
some emerging consumers that grew
up having coffee or other native
infusions. Cereals are a staple at
breakfast in some latitudes, but they
can be a popular tasty snack all day
long in others. Trying to impose
products reminds of the old colonial
style, while people in emerging
markets have learned to value more
their local traditions. I believe
willingness to learn and flexibility to
adapt are keys that explain success in
many cases. -
Do you think First Mover
Advantage would give foreign
companies a wider wedge in
emergingmarkets? I don't have doubts that pioneering is
exciting, but not necessarily more
successful. The key is to understand
the real needs of the locals and adapt
products or services to meet those
needs. Local companies may be better
suited to understand the needs of
their equals, and followers can learn
from the pioneers' mistakes and build
success over the precedent failure. -
What do you think would be the
critical success factors for operating in
emerging markets? What kind of
homework do you think that the
companies should do before
embarking on emerging markets'
journey? Start by looking at where the mass
market is, and go for a thorough
understanding of the actual needs. In
the end, it's organizations that learn
and care for their customers that
succeed, independently of their
country of origin. It resides in the
courage of the local management to
fight for their customers wants, many
times against their intellectually lazy,
one-size-fits-all regional or global
management. -
What do you think are the perils
of doing business in emerging
markets? Especially in BRIMC (Brazil,
Russia, India, Mexico and China)
countries? Emerging economies have strong
social imbalances, and while the
problems of the left-behind remain
unsolved, economic take-off is held
back every once in a while by the
weight of the excluded. I believe that
is the reason why crises repeat every
now and then, due to social unrest
that can't be muted in modern
democracies. Then it's like when the
croupier shouts "zero" at the roulette.
The crisis wipes out much of the
bets. But we must not disregard that
though badly hurt, the market stays
in place. It is then when consumers
see which companies are interested
in serving them by adapting their
products, or step back waiting for the
customers to slowly recover their
buying power. The formers will
experience hard times, but will come out with strengthened share and
loyalty and probably higher margins
when the economy recovers, while
the latterwill pay a high prize on their
later comeback. -
What do you mean by a "retail
innovation"? How is it different from
product, process, and business
model innovation? It's innovation in the retail sector. It
comprises the business model
redefined to suit the local needs in
ways unseen in any other markets.
1.
ICMR Emerging Market Case Studies
2. ICMR
Case Collection
3.
Case Study Volumes
|