Business Case Studies, Executive Interviews, Howard M Guttman on Building High Performance Teams

Help
Bookmark
Tell A Friend

Executive Interviews: Interview with Howard M Guttman on Building High Performance Teams
May 2009 - By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary


Howard M Guttman
principal of Guttman Development Strategies, Inc


Download this interview
  • Can you give an illustrative example of a ‘great’ business team? What specific lessons can be learnt from it?
    When Catherine Burzik became president of Applied Biosystems (AB), the company had been stagnant for several years, with little revenue growth and falling stock prices. Despite significant R&D expense, there were few new products in the pipeline. Both Wall Street and AB employees had lost confidence in the company. Burzik quickly moved to push decisionmaking down from her office to her EVPs. She created subteams and gave them the authority to deal with issues that didn’t require the full participation of the team. Speedy decision making and implementation began to replace bottlenecks and impasses. She was able to focus on the strategic issues facing the company. As a result, business accelerated. AB’s stock price nearly doubled, as did its market cap. Revenue began to grow and the bottom line has seen double-digit performance. After several years of no acquisitions, two significant ones were successfully completed.

    The lessons: First, the CEO – or any other teamleader, for thatmatter – has got to let go. Decision-making power needs to be distributed, not hoarded. Second, Burzik’s predecessor had become so entangled in the day-to-day operations of the business that he lost sight of his strategic responsibility. By creating a team that could be trusted to deal with the tactical, shewas able to refocus on the strategic.

  • What is their code for standout performance? What is their DNA?
    All great teams have five characteristics embedded in their “DNA”. They have a unique kind of leader: one who is willing to distribute power; puts a premium on open, honest communication; and insists that team members hold him or her accountable for commitments made. Members of high-performing teams are unique as well: playing for the team, not themselves; willing to accept the power and responsibility that have been entrusted to them; willing to accept accountability for their performance and their peers; willing to give and receive honest feedback. In addition, great teams have rules in place for decision making and interpersonal behavior; they are continually raising the performance bar; and they have in place a performance system that rewards not just what they accomplish, but how they achieve it.

  • You have outlined five requirements for successfully creating great teams on every level. For the benefit of our readers, can you please elaborate on these?
    First requirement: keep it simple. What drives this model is the way in which people interact with one another. By creating an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect, transparency, accountability, and agreed-upon rules of engagement, you automatically eliminate many of the barriers to efficient teamwork. Second, remember that moving to this model isn’t a step-by-step process from which you can’t deviate. There is no single “right way” to do it. When it comes to cascading the model down through the organization, we tell our clients, “Do what works for you.”

    Third, you also need commitment from the organization’s leaders – starting at the very top. They need to provide the vision and the passion to make it a reality. Fourth, leadership also needs to communicate clearly, to every level, what they are trying to do and how they are going to go about it. Transparency is key to obtaining buyin.

    Lastly, create a high-performing culture. Begin by asking: How can we reinforce the existing positive cultural values, such as a focus on results; a horizontal orientation; the willingness to be held accountable, to confront, and to be transparent; and other attributes of high-performance teams and players? Next, ask: What implicitly held values need to be brought to the surface, examined, and, if need be,modified or put aside. Some common inhibitors: niceness that gets in the way of candor; the tendency to overanalyze, a focus on consensus decision making, risk aversion, and the like. Build on the positive and eliminate the negative aspects of your existing culture in order to create a robust culture of high performance throughout your organization.

Contact us: IBS Case Development Centre (IBSCDC), IFHE Campus, Donthanapally, Sankarapally Road, Hyderabad-501203, Telangana, INDIA.
Mob: +91- 9640901313,
E-mail: casehelpdesk@ibsindia.org

©2020-2025 IBS Case Development Centre. All rights reserved. | Careers | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Disclosure | Site Map xml sitemap