Executive Interviews: Interview with Kai-Alexander Schlevogt on Emerging Markets
February 2008
-
By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary
Prof. Kai-Alexander Schlevogt Professor of international strategy and leadership at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School.
He serves as Program Director of the Nestle Global Leadership Program, delivered in association with London Business School.
What do you think is the best way
to develop successful strategies for
China? Let me start with the process of
devising strategy and then talk about
strategy content. In emerging markets
like China, it is usually impossible to
develop a “perfect” strategy on a
drawing board in one round of
iteration. There may even be no
meaningful data on which decisions could be based. Market research
cannot be conducted in industries
that do not exist. In such a situation, I
recommend executives to try out
different strategic options that do not
require significant investment at first,
gather feedback on their effectiveness,
eliminate unsuccessful candidates
and look after those seeds that are
promising. Instead of using a scatter
gun approach and thus “boiling the
ocean”, companies should start with
a few strong hypotheses of what
might succeed. Based on the
evidence, the commitment and
exposure to China can be increased
step by step. To avoid the sunk cost
fallacy of throwing bad money after
good, exiting the market must at all
times be regarded as a realistic option. As in a diverse ecosystem, a wide
range of strategies can succeed in
China if they are backed by a strong
corporate resource platform. In this
respect, execution is at least as
important as positioning. In terms of
entry vehicles, a firm may start with
exporting to China, then set up a
representative office there, establish a strategic alliance, take aminority stake
in an existing company, transform it
into a majority holding and later
develop Greenfield sites. Along the
way, it has tomake a deliberate choice
between clear focus and rapid
expansion. For example, a foreign
cereal maker learnt about the dangers
of proliferation and came to
appreciate the value of concentrating
resources. It discovered that trying to
succeed in all of China’s regions with
its entire product range targeting a
wide range of customer segments
through myriad channels resulted in
a collection of feeble positions.
Afterwards, it focused on a small
number of carefully screened
opportunities, such as a set of what I
call “experiential quadruple ones”:
One product for one market targeted
at one segment distributed through
one channel. This approach makes it
also easier to attribute success or
failure to a limited set of factors. The
company can subsequently grow
those ventures that succeeded in the
pilot stage. A second important choice is
between molding the environment
and adapting to it. A multinational
company may either shape the
market, pushing a novel concept to it,
or tailor its product offering and
business model to the local
circumstances. Among other things,
factors to consider are global
economies of scale favoring market
shaping with standardized offerings
on the one hand and local
idiosyncrasies requiring
customization on the other hand.
Executives have to be particularly
careful to avoid the “products-insearch-
of-markets” trap. For example,
they should not dump old
technologies to China, assuming that
this will satisfy most Chinese people.
Many Chinese customers are global
early adopters, eager for the latest
products. Kodak singled out China as
a large market for traditional
photography. But people in the
Middle Kingdomwere fast to embrace
digital technology. Likewise, mobile
technology spread more quickly than
many analysts expected. A large
number of households did not bother
to acquire fixed phone lines, but
leapfrogged into the wireless future. It is also vital to prepare for the
emergence of a broad middle class in
China. Executives must abandon
incorrect mental models, such as the
belief that only high-income segments
are attractive,which need to be served
with premium products. To capture
market share among low income
households that are likely to get
richer, it might not be sufficient to
tweak products. Companies may
have to develop an entirely new value
delivery system to offer reliable, no
frills products at very low prices.
This might require reconfiguring
resources in novel ways or acquiring
tangible and intangible assets. Along
the way, it is crucial to keep the China
unit integrated in the global
organization.
|
The Interview was conducted by Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary, Consulting Editor, Effective
Executive and Dean, IBSCDC, Hyderabad. This Interview was originally published in Effective Executive, IUP, February 2008. Copyright © February 2008, Prof. Dr. Kai-Alexander Schlevogt.
All Rights Reserved.
No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or distributed, stored in a retrieval
system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or medium – electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise – without the permission of Prof. Dr. Kai-Alexander Schlevogt. |