Executive Interviews: Interview with Fang Lee Cooke on The China Factor
November 2007
-
By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary
Dr. Fang Lee Cooke Full Professor of HRM and Chinese Studies at Manchester Business School University of Manchester.
-
Statistics show that China is one of
the preferred destinations for foreign
direct investment and it has
experienced a 36%increase in Fortune
500 representation, with four new
companies making the list this year.
The Chinese government is
implementing infrastructural change
to help its national businesses become
global players and achieve its target of
50 Fortune 500 companies. Why
shouldMNCs take somuch interest in
the Chinese market? What do you
think China can offer to all the MNCs?
|
|
Yes, China has been one of the top
countries in attracting foreign direct
investments. I have already
mentioned China's attraction to
foreign firms. I just want to add that
China is a large country with rich
resources, be it human or cultural
resources. We can offer different
things to MNCs that look for different
things in China. China can be a tourist
site, amanufacturing company, a head office, a training ground, a conference
center, an international fair arena, a
supermarket, a bank, anything.
-
What do you think is the bestway to
enter China? Is it after a thorough
market research, through experiential
learning sans any research, or should
it be likeMicrosoft's (waiting patiently
for almost 15 years and becoming
successful through 'partnering')? There are different entry modes if a
firm is seeking to enter China,
depending on the size of the firm, the
nature of the business it does and its
motive of entering China. One can set
up an office, a new branch, a solelyowned
subsidiary or a joint venture.
But whatever it does, it is important
that it does its homework thoroughly
before taking any decisions. But
perhaps not many firms can afford to
wait for 15 years before they act. -
You would find two kinds of
companies (MNCs) going to China;
those shifting their manufacturing
bases to China to benefit from the
supposedly low-cost advantage and
those that primarily want to sell their
wares/services to Chinese consumers.
Do you foresee an overcrowded
market? Would the so-called cost
advantage not be evened out in the
long run (because the aggregate wage
level would eventually increase as a
result of extra demand)? You are right in that there is a risk of
overcrowding of market and the
erosion of low-cost labor. Already,
certain segments of the product
markets are overcrowded and the
local firms are doingmuch better than
foreign firms; for example, household
electronic goods. But there is an
increasing hunger fromthe expanding
middle-class in China for designer
products or products that carry a
reputable brand image or new
concepts. So, there is always amarket in China for certain types of products.
In terms of labor cost, there are
emerging signs that plants are
relocating to other developing
countries that offer even lower wages
than China. Some manufacturing
plants in China have experienced
labor shortages in the last few years,
triggering a Mingong huang (shortage
of ruralmigrantworkers) in 2004. Part
of the reason for thisMingong huang is
the low wages, long working hours
and poor working and living
conditions for workers. This situation
of labor shortage is still ongoing in
certain areas, such as Guangdong
Province where many foreign
manufacturing plants are located. -
What is the best way to compete in
China? Is it through cost advantage or
is it through differentiation; or a
combination of these two? A lot depends on your productmarket
position. It is quite difficult for foreign
firms to be able to operate more
cheaply than local firms and gain cost
advantage. So, differentiation with
niche product may be a better choice.
Firms can try to source their materials
or products in China to reduce cost
and develop new products that suit
Chinese tastes. Some supermarket
giants operating in China are doing
that. Whatever you sell, or whichever
end of themarket you are in, pricewill
always remain a sensitive issue to the
Chinese consumers. In general,
foreign MNCs in China are in a
relatively better competitive position
than the majority of Chinese firms.
They are able to offer various products
that are marked by high quality,
innovative design and high brand
value. They are also more likely to
attract talent because of their
prestigious corporate image and better
employment prospects. However, the
competitive advantage of foreign firms
in China over domestic firms is by no means absolute. There are a number
of key differences in their operating
environment and organizational
resources. For example, Chinese firms
are more familiar with the local
culture, better able to mobilize social
networks, including government
bodies, to obtain business resources
and bypass legal constraints. -
How far should MNCs customize
their business models (for instance,
Microsoft, Dell, Google, Yahoo, Wal-
Mart, etc. tweaked their business
models to suit China operations)?
Should every company (MNC)
customize its business model? It is difficult to generalize. However, a
level of adaptation and customization
is often needed when MNCs operate
in different regions due to
institutional and cultural differences.
There have been cases that some
foreign firms do not adapt their
products sufficiently to tailor for the
Chinese markets. Instead, they
transplant their products and
programs, which are attractive and
affordable to only a small number of
affluent Chinese consumers. MNCs
should develop sensitivity to price
and culture in the Chinese market in
order to compete successfully. Local
culture is one of the most important
influences on marketing efforts and
the strong Chinese culture is unlikely
to be changed by an innovative
Western idea or product if it is
perceived impractical.
1.
Google's Problems in China Case Study
2. ICMR
Case Collection
3.
Case Study Volumes
|