Executive Interviews: Interview with Fang Lee Cooke on The China Factor
November 2007
-
By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary
Dr. Fang Lee Cooke Full Professor of HRM and Chinese Studies at Manchester Business School University of Manchester.
Leading foreign firms are
nevertheless learning their lessons in
China and have adapted their strategy
more proactively to winmarket share.
For example, global retail giants such
as IKEA and Tesco are now more
proactive in tailoring their products
and store layouts to suit the Chinese
consumers' tastes. They are also
aiming to retain customers by offering
high quality products with highly competitive price. Many Fortune 500
companies operating in China have
deployed an adaptation and
localization strategy in translating
their brand name into the Chinese
language to reflect the significant
linguistic, social and cultural
differences across societies.
|
|
Such a
strategy enables firms to capitalize on
the localization of their brand names
that aremoremeaningful, reflectmore
positive connotations, reflect more
product benefits or characteristics,
and possess more desirable linguistic
characteristics than the original
names. Moreover, leading MNCs in
China are beginning to recognize the
need to take a more responsive
approach to managing their corporate
relationship with the Chinese
government and its associated
political bodies. For example, Wal-
Mart had been resisting for years
China's request to establish a trade
union for its workforce, claiming that
itwas its global corporateHR policy to
have a non-unionized workforce. It
recognizes the trade union in China
now and has expressed willingness to
develop a good relationship with the
All-China Federation of Trade Unions
(ACFTU) that will be beneficial to
both workers and the corporation. How do you thinkMNCs should go
about as regards sourcing of talent?
Should they hire Chinesemanagers or
expatriates? What should be talent
management strategy of theMNCs? I think the global staffing trend is now
moving towards localization,
although a small number of
expatriates are deemed necessary.
MNCs are in an advantageous
position in attracting and retaining
talent in China. They are the 'most
desired' employers for Chinese
graduates because they believe these
MNCs offer more opportunities for
them to utilize their talent and realize
their own value. High income is also an important reason. However, there
is a 'War for Talent' in China and the
retention of talent is often a problem.
Well-educated young Chinese
workers are ambitious and are eager to
reach to the top of their career. They
not only expect lucrative financial
packages, but also demand early
promotion and (overseas) career
development opportunities fromtheir
employers. Where these demands are
not met or where there are better
offers elsewhere, they are ready to
switch employers. Some Western
MNCs are considering deploying
Western HR initiatives such as
diversity management and work-life
balance to retain talented employees.
However, these may not be the right
HR initiatives for the Chinese context.
MNCs need to analyze their human
resource environment in China, and
design a set of HR policies that is
relevant and effective in the Chinese
context that may be different from
what they have in other countries. There is an increasing trend of
Chinese companies going global,
either through FDI or M&A (Haier,
Lenovo, Huawei, ZTE, SAIC's 50.6%
acquisition of Korea's Ssangyong,
China PetroleumCorporation's US$42
bn acquisition of PetroKazakhstan,
etc.) Two key issueswhile going global
are: having real knowledge of the
foreign market and the best
preparation possible. How do you
evaluate Chinese companies on these
two parameters? I have to say that Chinese companies
could do better on both parameters,
although they are learning from their
lessons. Management autonomy and
management competence are two
related dimensions that are often
notably absent in Chinese State-
Owned Enterprises (SOEs). Since
SOEs make up a large proportion of
the Chinese FDI, these deficiencies
may have serious implications for the performance of Chinese FDI. It has
been reported that Chinese managers
have no obvious expertise to help
them make sensible investment
decisions abroad. Many Chinese
companies reach their decisions on
overseas investment without a clear
idea about why they are investing
overseas, where they should locate
their subsidiaries, and how they can
develop overseas markets. In
particular, the Chinese government's
policy of developing variousmediumsize
and large state-owned enterprises
into business groups and its insistence
that the groups should establish
themselves to be amongst the world's
largest enterprises within a specified
period of time has led some
companies to rush into overseas
investment. There is a shortage of
skills among the Chinese
management in handlingMergers and
Acquisitions (M&As) negotiations and
post-M&A integration in China.
Embarking on overseas acquisition,
post-acquisition integration and
managing overseas subsidiaries
present even greater difficulties for
Chinese managers because of their
lack of knowledge of the business
environment of the host countries and
international standards. Which Chinese industries and
companies, according to you, hold the
best prospects for becoming global
players? This is like a fortune-telling exercise.
It is difficult to say as world business
is changing so fast, and some changes
are very unpredictable. In the near
future, I think the Chinese ICT
industry and leading firms operating
in this industry will become major
global competitors. There are already
signs of their global success or, at least,
market occupation. What do you think are the
advantages and disadvantages of
Chinese companies? Do you think
Chinese companies are well-prepared
to establish 'Made in China' or 'China'
brand globally, with all the negative
publicity attracted in recent times
(recall of toys and cribs and food
safety concerns, etc.)? In Western countries, where
competition is hinged on quality,
innovation, brand and corporate
reputation, integrated distribution
network and market domination,
Chinese firms in general do not have
much competitive advantage. In other
developing countries, Chinese firms
will have more advantages
comparatively speaking and in similar
ways to that of foreign MNCs in
China. For example, possessing a
higher level of technological
competence, more financial
resources, better management knowhow
andmore sophisticated products
at affordable prices to the locals.
Whilst Chinese brands in the West
may be associated with poor quality
and cheap price, it may be an
attractive brand in other developing
countries. Certain Chinese products
are gradually gaining a good brand
reputation in the West, although this
is only a small handful, e.g., Haier's
refrigerator products. Many Western
brand do carry the label 'Made in
China' and these products are of a
very high quality. So, China does have
the capacity to produce high quality
products.
1.
Google's Problems in China Case Study
2. ICMR
Case Collection
3.
Case Study Volumes
|