Business Case Studies, Executive Interviews, Ravi Ramamurti on Bottom of the Pyramid

Help
Bookmark
Tell A Friend

Executive Interviews: Interview with Ravi Ramamurti on Bottom of the Pyramid
November 2008 - By Dr. Nagendra V Chowdary


Dr. Ravi Ramamurti
CBA Distinguished Professor of International Business & Strategy,
and Director of the Center for Emerging Markets at Northeastern University.


Download this interview
  • First, a word about your forthcoming book, Emerging Multinationals from Emerging Markets. What triggered your interest in the emerging markets? What powerful insights and fresh perspectives does this book add to the already existing body of knowledge?
    As an Indian, I have always been interested in the business challenges facing firms in emerging economies. All my research and consulting over the past 30 years have been set in the emerging economies of Asia and Latin America. In the 1980s, I wrote and consulted on how to improve the competitiveness of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in developing countries. In the 1990s,

    I wrote and consulted on how best to privatize these firms and deregulate their sectors. In the process, many firms in the developing world were sold to local business groups, such as the Tata or Reliance groups in India and their counterparts in other countries. Others were sold to foreign multinationals, such as Unilever or France Telecom.

    In the 2000s,many of these privatized firms were revitalized and they began to internationalize. At the same time, many private firms established in the import-substitution era reinvented themselves to compete successfully at home and abroad—Indian examples would include firms like Hindalco, Wipro, Ranbaxy, Tata Steel, and Videocon. Finally, a host of new firms created after economic liberalization began to compete globally quite early in their lives— Indian examples of this would include firms like Suzlon Energy, GVK Biosciences, and hundreds of small software or BPO companies. In the last few years, my research has focused on the internationalization of these three types of emerging-market firms.

    My latest book, Emerging Multinationals from Emerging Markets (Cambridge University Press, 2009) brings together some of the world's leading experts in international business, who have researched the internationalization of firms, each from one emerging economy. We discussed the findings threadbare at a conference organized by Northeastern University's Center for Emerging Markets and two research centers at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. The revised studies constitute the chapters of this book.

    The book yielded many useful insights. We learned that Emerging- Market Multinational Enterprises (EMNEs) internationalize on the basis of very different competitive advantages than Western multinationals. Their capabilities are rooted in the distinctive features of emerging economies, such as lowincome consumers, low-wage workers, underdeveloped infrastructure, weak institutions, and rapid growth. Multinational firms have always started out with strengths derived from characteristics of their home market, and that is true also of EMNEs. It's just that emerging economies have different characteristics than developed economies.

    Basically, firms in emerging markets tend to internationalize on the basis a few generic strategies. I stumbled upon this taxonomy as a result of watching firms in emerging economies for many years.

    The local optimizer strategy is a firm that makes products, and use production methods, optimized for emerging economies. This usually entails products that are rugged, easy to maintain, and not very expensive, and whose production is done with raw materials, processes, and "appropriate technologies" that keep capital and operating costs low. A good Indian example is Mahindra & Mahindra, whose modestly priced SUV (Scorpio) and low cost tractors are well suited to India and therefore to many other emerging economies. The internationalization of local optimizers is founded on this transferable competitive advantage.

    The low cost partner is a firm that arbitrages the low wages of emerging markets to become a supplier partner of companies in high wage countries. This strategy is particularly powerful in China and India, which have large pools of low wage, skilled and unskilled workers. The arbitrage strategy works less powerfully for middle income developing countries, such as Brazil, Mexico, and Thailand, and is not viable in high income countries, such as Singapore or Hong Kong. The target market for the exports of these EMNEs is developed countries. FDI in the developed countries may follow as the firms attempt to move up the value curve. Chinese firms pursuing this strategy aremore likely to be inmanufacturing (e.g. Wanxiang, an auto parts supplier), and Indian firms pursuing this strategy are more likely to be in services (e.g. Infosys or Wipro), but the distinction is likely to blur over time. The low cost partner is likely to expand into other emerging markets to diversify the supply locations from which it serves customers in highwage countries. Thus, its competitive foundations and internationalization paths are quite different from those of the local optimizer.

1. Bottom of the Pyramid Case Study
2. ICMR Case Collection
3. Case Study Volumes

Previous 1  2  3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Next

Contact us: IBS Case Development Centre (IBSCDC), IFHE Campus, Donthanapally, Sankarapally Road, Hyderabad-501203, Telangana, INDIA.
Mob: +91- 9640901313,
E-mail: casehelpdesk@ibsindia.org

©2020-2025 IBS Case Development Centre. All rights reserved. | Careers | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Disclosure | Site Map xml sitemap